Wednesday 28 December 2011

"Emas traffic panels hardly help to avoid congestion" - ST, 27 Dec 2011

"Emas traffic panels hardly help to avoid congestion" - Straits Times, 27 Dec 2011, link http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/Story/STIStory_748948.html

28 Dec 2011

To: Transport Minister Lui,

The letter writer is echoing what many frustrated motorists (including me - see my attached email dated 8 Aug 2011) are facing on a DAILY basis.

The government collects billions from motorists via road taxes, ERP, COEs, etc but the transport system still sucks!

Rgds

=====================================
ReEmas traffic panels hardly help to avoid congestion
RECENTLY, I was caught in a massive traffic jam along the East Coast Parkway (ECP) towards the city. I then tried to get off at the next exit so that I could use Nicoll Highway instead. It took me almost an hour to drive from Marine Parade to Fort Road.
Soon I headed straight into another jam as I passed the Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) gantry along Nicoll Highway.
How wish I had been forewarned of these jams.
If I knew there was traffic congestion along the ECP, I would have used Mountbatten Road; if I knew there was a traffic jam on Nicoll Highway, I would have gone via Kallang.
The Expressway Monitoring Advisory System (Emas) hardly helps. From my experience and that of other drivers I have spoken to, the Emas often tells one there is a jam ahead only when one is already in it.
While the Land Transport Authority (LTA) is expanding the system to have more displays installed at road junctions leading to expressways, they will be of use only if they offer timely and more precise information.
The LTA should show a colour-coded map on its Emas panels, giving an idea of the traffic situation in and around the congested zone. Congested roads should be shown in red with flashing lights.
Such a system is widely used in Bangkok, Thailand and Beijing, China. They are more informative and can help drivers plan their route better to avoid traffic jams.
The display panels used in Beijing and Bangkok are mostly smaller than the Emas panels here, so the system can be implemented with the current infrastructure.
Chen Bin 
=======================================

Subject: It took me 1 hr 45 min to go from Shenton Way to Sungei Gedong! - High price to pay to drive in S’pore, The Star, 6 Aug 2011 - Singapore’s Transport Woes, The Diplomat, 6 Aug 2011
1. Singapore’s Transport Woes, The Diplomat, 6 Aug 2011
2. High price to pay to drive in S’pore, The Star, 6 Aug 2011

8 Aug 2011

To: Mr Lui Tuck Yew - Transport Minister
cc: Permanent Secretary CHOI Shing Kwok
cc: Josephine Teo - Minister of State
cc: REACH Feedback Unit

It took me 1 hour and 45 minutes (from 5pm to 6.45pm) to go from Shenton Way to Sungei 
Gedong last Friday, 5th August 2011 by car (vs 30 minutes for the 30 km journey normally).

Upon turning onto ECP at Keppel (towards Jurong), EMAS warned motorists of jams ahead 
to Buona Vista, so I exited at Bukit Merah, then proceeded to Queensway, hoping to turn 
onto PIE at Adam Road, but before long, I heard on radio (Gold 90.5) that PIE to Jurong 
was also jammed from Eng Neo, so I exited at Bukit Timah from Farrer Road. It was getting 
from hot water to frying pan because the jams along Bukit Timah Road to Clementi Road 
were even worse. Finally, after clearing Bt Timah Road, I turned onto PIE at Clementi 
before traffic became smooth, and by the time I reached Sungei Gedong, it had taken 
me 1 hour and 45 minutes! For a moment, it seemed I was in infamously gridlocked cities 
like Bangkok or Jakarta!

Clearly, something needs to be done, and quickly.

I don't normally do this as I don't intend to take over your multi-million dollar salaried job 
(or the jobs of your equally expensive junior ministers, Permanent Secretaries, etc), but I 
do have a suggested simple solution to Singapore's transport woes: a "live" traffic feed on 
vehicles' in-vehicle unit (IU) that provides real time information where the worst jams are 
(ranked by speed per 100 metres?) so that motorists can plan their routes in advance in 
order to avoid these heavily jammed roads before they exacerbate the situation? (I am 
unable to ascertain how "real time" existing resources like apps and radio are while 
EMAS is not proactive enough because motorists are already on the expreesways: they 
need to be warned BEFORE they embark on their journeys).
Of course, such a solution may involve spending millions on upgrading the software and 
hardware but with billions collected annually from COEs, ERP, vehicle & road taxes, etc, 
it is small change to the government.

Rgds
Jeff

======================================================

Further reading: Singapore’s Transport Woes, The Diplomat, 6 Aug 2011
http://the-diplomat.com/asean-beat/2011/08/06/singapores-transport-woes/

Saturday August 6, 2011

High price to pay to drive in S’pore

INSIGHT DOWN SOUTH BY SEAH CHIANG NEE


Young car-crazy Singaporeans complain of being deprived of the chance to buy and own a vehicle, with the price of a certificate to own a car costing more than RM120,000.
THE Singapore commuter, whether using the car or train, is not looking ahead with a great deal of enthusiasm.
Living among five million people, he will likely face not only continuing over-crowdedness but also a slew of price increases in the months – possibly years – ahead.
Public transport – next to housing and healthcare – has become a casualty to rapid population expansion.
When we had three million (in 1990) it was a breeze; at four million (2000), jams were starting to show on roads, in public housing and hospitals and other facilities.
But with five million currently, some things are bursting at the seams.
“I think it will take another five to 10 years to balance supply and demand in facilities like transport and housing to cope with the expansion,” said an economist friend.
Until then, he expected continuing overcrowding in trains and buses at peak hours, with the government trying to control it by raising fees.
These days, unlike a year ago, I am frequently getting a “Sorry but all our taxis are busy” response whenever I phone for a cab, even on weekdays.
And in the Singapore General Hospital, car parks are full on most days.
“Our government seems to be trying to resolve problems of insufficiency mainly by raising prices to reduce demand,” he added.
These rising costs of transportation (excluding petrol pump prices) are adding to an already high cost of living.
In June, the consumer price index rose to 5.2%, up from 4.5% a year ago, with transport (rising 10.4%) being a top gainer.
The prospect for relief in the coming months – irrespective of whether a commuter drives or uses public transportation – is slim.
Consider the following:
> Public transport: Operators of trains and buses have applied for price increases, and the government looks likely to grant their requests, despite strong public reaction.
> Roads: Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) rates at two busy highways serving tens of thousands of cars were raised on Aug 1 in the latest quarterly review.
> Parking: In the central business district it costs an average of S$30.40 (RM75) a day, with a survey saying central Singapore has the most expensive car parks in South-East Asia.
> Cars: The cost of a COE (Certificate of Entitlement) hovers at a 14-year high. This piece of paper is required if one wants to buy a new car: S$49,000 (RM120,958) for a 1,600cc car and S$70,000 (RM172,698) for one of higher capacity. In comparison, the cost of a car varies from S$80,000 (RM197,350) to S$100,000 (RM246,687).
The flourishing COE market is one of the unusual features of Singapore.
“It now costs more to buy a COE for a medium-sized car than to buy 1kg of gold,” a blogger observed.
Some of my Malaysian friends have found it hard to understand the rationale.
One of them laughed when he first heard that Singaporeans had to pay S$49,000 (RM120,958) for a piece of paper before he can purchase a car that cost the Japanese only S$15,000 (RM37,074) to build.
“It’s a terrific idea. The Japanese do all the work, while the government here makes a profit three times bigger.”
The government justified the COE – just like the electronic road pricing – as necessary to reduce the number of cars on the road.
It wants to avoid the sort of traffic gridlock many advanced cities face.
The Singaporean motorist is not laughing. He has seen COE prices rising higher and higher in tandem with the number of wealthy foreigners settling here.
For some, it is a good reason for speculation – for selling short if you believe this record high is a balloon waiting to burst, some cynics said.
“If there were derivative instruments based on COE prices, I’d be shorting them,” said a blogger.
“Talk about ‘prices can only go up’ are fairly good indicators of bubble tops.”
Consequently, the high COE cost has put paid to the dream of many young Singaporeans who earn between S$2,500 (RM6,180) and $4,000 (RM9,885) a month to own a car.
The COE lasts 10 years, after which a new one is needed.
An owner who scraps his car after five years, for example, will get a rebate of about half of what he paid. So if he had paid high, his rebate will be high; if he had got it cheap, it will be low.
But the cost to the public is high.
Young car-crazy Singaporeans complain of deprivation as a result of the high cost of buying and owning a vehicle in Singapore, one of the costliest places in the world.
Expensive houses and cars are often cited as reasons for more professionals migrating to Australia or New Zealand.
An online critic said: “The COE system is promoting waste by encouraging owners to discard perfectly functional cars and replacing them with new models.
“In other developed countries, it is not unusual to see a 1965 Beetle (or cars older than 15 years) still in good and roadworthy condition.”
It has also become a source of inflation. The owner is generally encouraged to buy a new car rather than repair it.
“Under the present immigration policy, expect COE to hit S$250,000 (RM617,810) one day, and cars maybe half a million dollars (RM1.2mil),” warned a letter writer.

Thursday 22 December 2011

SMRT's problems reflect Singapore's and PAP's misplaced "talent" system


"Signalling fault causes delay (on the morning of Thursday, 22 Dec 2011) at MRT stations" - Channel News Asia, 22 Dec 2011


22 Dec 2011

Dear Mr Lui (and PM Lee who is ultimately accountable as Mr Lui's boss),

The problems of our public transport system never seem to end ..... 

It seems SMRT's problems have become a daily occurrence - delays here and breakdowns there!

At the same time, I thought you might like to read the interesting article (attached) on what is thoroughly wrong with Singapore's and PAP's misplaced "talent" system, "Is it only about SMRT"!

Rgds


===============================================


Is it only about SMRT?

I am getting quite fed up. Not long after PTC announced that fares on buses and MRTs are going up, ComfortDelgro announced fare “revisions”. This is on top of an expectation of higher costs of living, and stagnant wages. Worse still, social workers are now on standby to counsel people who may become victims of a global recession in the coming year. Of course public transport companies are all showing healthy profits. COEs are now incredibly expensive. So unless really well-heeled, those without cars can forget about getting their own vehicles. Actually it looks as if all companies running public transportation systems will see profits continuing to rise. How difficult can it be to make money? They have millions of commuters who require their services, and if cost of business gets high, they can just raise fares. They will have the blessings of the powers that be.
Then the breakdowns. What really makes me furious about the breakdowns is not the breakdowns themselves but the way the evacuation process was handled. It is inexcusable to allow passengers in crowded trains to stay in carriages with no ventilation and in the dark for more than an hour. Trains are mechanical devices and breakdowns, though never welcomed, have to be expected. Contingency plans should have been in place to evacuate. Why did they not kick in?
Needless to say, the public is now calling for blood. Many have called for the CEO to resign. As usual, main stream media has to put in some form of damage control. In the last few days, there have been reports singing the praises of Ms Saw and her abilities. They work…NOT.
Take a look at her credentials. She was a Retail Director of DFS. RETAIL! How is a Retail Director suitable as the CEO of SMRT– a public transport company? What it tells me is that just like the rest of Singapore, the main focus is profit generation, not the well running of trains or providing services for the citizens.
Next, the papers highlight how she tripled the profit of SMRT since taking over from 56m in 2002 to 161m in 2011. Sounds impressive? Not really. SMRT has a captive and rapidly increasing ridership. If she has given the public better, more efficient train services, and controlled fare prices or even reduced them, I will be impressed. But with increasingly more crowded trains and ever increasing fares – how difficult can it be to increase profit? So she used available space for retail outlets to generate rental income. Given the escalating cost of rentals in Singapore, it does not take a genius to figure this scheme to make money. The question is how much of this money has been returned to commuters, to improve the trains, as compared to the amount pocketed as bonuses and salaries of top management and directors? How much of this profit is the result of hiring cheaper “foreign talents” to replace our more experienced, local technical and professional staff? Why is there a need to increase fares if she has done so well by way of profits? I think we need some answers.
SMRT problems unfortunately are symptomatic of many things that are going wrong with the country. We pay top dollar for so called top people. Except that I wonder if there is proper skill matching. How is Ms Saw suitable if her area of expertise is retail? Top dollar for the best people. Sounds logical except that when we pay top dollar for, say, a military man – does his skill set match what is needed to be, say, an education minister? Or finance minister? Sure, if a potential minister, who happens to be a highly paid cardiologist, remains a doctor, he will be paid millions. I doubt if Citibank will pay him millions to be their CEO though. But we think nothing of co-opting someone like that into the government and paying him very well indeed to be a rookie politician or  minister in a field that may be totally unrelated to his profession. We just trust his intellectual acumen will be enough to make him the right man for the job.
In the event of problems, we highlight profits made. In the case of the government, we throw GDP figures in the faces of the citizens. The real issues that worry or anger the people are often given only cursory attention. Take for instance Lui Tuck Yew and his concerns over the overcrowded trains, and the frequency that the trains are running, and whether that meant maintenance has been compromised. Aren’t overcrowded trains thanks largely to the increased numbers of foreigners in the country? Haven’t we grumbled about that before? Then Rear Adm Teo mentioned contingency plans and proper evacuation. Ermmm – we do not need million dollar ministers to tell us that. We do not need you to tell us the problems – we have been telling you about the problems for a long time. We are looking to you for solutions.
We are always told to bear with it, to work together, to understand. Who is going to tell the employer to understand the lateness of his staff? Who is going to compensate the man who is penalized financially by the lateness – whether because he is an hourly rated worker or if he missed an important appointment thanks to the breakdown? We are always having to understand difficulties, but all you have to do is to apologise for inconveniences suffered? And be paid millions for it? On the other hand, the ordinary person who may lose money for this inconvenience – something that often causes real pain, are just told to bear with it? To move on?  How can you even understand what losing $20 mean to a daily rated worker, when the value of money has become so cheap to you who earn so much?
I am feeling very discouraged. The issues surrounding SMRT are really similar to the issues surrounding many government policies. We cannot focus on money alone, whether in terms of profit or GDP or in terms of paying the top man obscene amounts of money. The focus has to be the well being of the citizenry.
Anyway what’s the point of my ranting? When Gerard Ee proposes new ministerial salary, I am steeling myself to see a token reduction. Leopards do not change their spots.
However, a straw can definitely break the camel’s back. There is only so much people can bear.

Friday 16 December 2011

SMRT breakdowns: Singapore going ... From 1st world to the 3rd? - Re: S'pore still long way from efficient/buzzy HK and civilised Japan!

To: "lui_tuck_yew@mot.gov.sg" <lui_tuck_yew@mot.gov.sg>


" .... SG going from First World back to the Third :( from whence we came in less than two generations?"

16 Dec 2011

Singapore is now paying the price for past PAP policy failures and ministerial complacency!

What's this I read that "National Servicemen may be deployed to safeguard rail network: Masagos"? - link http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC111214-0000085/National-Servicemen-may-be-deployed-to-safeguard-rail-network--Masagos ?

With SMRT saving on costs (cheap labour from deploying NSmen, minimal or lack of proper maintenance - hence the frequent breakdowns?, etc), where do all the profits go? SMRT CEO? Temasek and their top executives?

Rgds
http://trackinglui.blogspot.com/2011/12/mrt-breakdowns-singapore-going-from-1st.html
===============================================
http://singaporegirl.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/from-1st-world-to-the-3rd/







From 1st world to the 3rd?

Poor SMRT! I heard the news on 93.8 Live — while driving home — of the breakdown on the North South Line at the peak apres work hours!
This coming hot on the heels of the break down fiasco on the Circle Line makes me ask:
Is it just a case of baaaaad luck or is it the first manifestation of SG going from First World back to the Third :( from whence we came in less than two generations?
=======================================






http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?106287-Crumbling-of-Singapore






Crumbling of Singapore?


1. MRT Congestion
2. Housing problem
3. Hospital beds shortage
4. Unemployment of locals
5. Increased suicide rate
6. Unhappiness of citizens
7. Road congestion
8. High ERP rates without easing traffic congestion
9. Bus crowdedness
10. Compelling SG guys to do NS but unable to convince them
11. PAP running out of idea how to promote economic growth but having to resort to vices such as gambling.
12. Increased social problems and integration due to high influx of cheap, unskilled and unqualified migrant laboour with their 3rd world social behaviour and lawlessness

Are these signs of the crumbling of Singapore? The pap appears to run out of ideas how to bring SG forward but is taking the obvious easy ways out, bringing long term problems to SG.

Are the recent MRT failures precursors to more failures to come? Will there be forthcoming systemic failures of the Transport system, Medical Institutions, Housing issues, social problems?
================================================================
Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew said on Thursday night the Land Transport Authority will assemble a team of experts to conduct a 'thorough health check' of the MRT system.
(LKY once famously said we are paying premium because we have men with vision in the cabinet, who can foretell problems)

Mr Lui, who is in Cambodia, noted in a post on his Facebook page that 'there have been a number of train disruptions in recent days'. 
(Really, Mr Lui, what a surprise! And only in recent days right?)

'I do not know if these are isolated incidents or whether there are systemic and more serious underlying issues causing these breakdowns.'
(With all the problems in recent months, we are not sure whether this is an isolated incident? What frequency of breakdowns if classified as 'isolated' Mr Minister? And with multi-million dollar salaries taken by you and your *** CEO you have not even instigated to find out what is happening?

His ministry will therefore conduct a 'thorough health check' of the MRT train system to determine how the faults happened, he said. 
(I really don't know what to say, beyond saying that everytime something like that happens, all our ministers say they will do a health check).

It will also look into whether the maintenance, communication and recovery processes were adhered to and how these can be further improved.
(What **  are we paying the CEO for? Nothing much to 'look into' Mr Lui - just read press reports of the **** Press Holdings and you have half the answers).

To do so, he has asked the LTA to assemble a team of relevant experts, including possibly overseas experts, to help conduct the review.
(Why are we even deciding on having FT experts when the committee has not been formed, the terms of reference not decided, let alone whether there is a gap in the expertise of the compostion of the committee).

Mr Lui said he was following Thursday night's MRT breakdown from Cambodia, where he is attending the 17th Asean Transport Ministers' Meeting and associated meetings with Asean Dialogue Partners in Phnom Penh.(Follow, huh, instead of given leadership. Hello, you Follower or Leader, Mr Lui?

'I am especially concerned over the well-being of the people who were reported to be trapped in the trains for an extended period of time before they made their way to safety,' he said. (Talk is cheap. What did you instruct to minimise the well-being of the travellers? Or were you and still are in the dark?)

Late on Thursday night, LTA deputy chief executive Lim Bok Ngam said the recent series of disruptions were 'indeed worrisome'.
(*** 'Worrisome' is all they can say? Worrisome for what? That his *** bonus will be cut? Come to think of it, if I am not good enough to be minister, I can walk into the LTA deputy CEO position).

The LTA will investigate the cause and engage an expert team to determine the underlying issues, he said.
(Which template are you using now, for such situations? Template # 47?)

He added: 'Obviously, from public feedback tonight, SMRT must do much more in their communications to the public to provide timely onsite information to help commuters make decisions on what alternative transport best suits them in the event of a disruption of this nature.'
http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?106290-With-stupid-comments-like-these-I-can-also-be-Minister-Shit-Face-without-his-looks
===================================================










To:
 "lui_tuck_yew@mot.gov.sg" <lui_tuck_yew@mot.gov.sg>
Cc: Hsien Loong <lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg>; "kinlian@gmail.com" <kinlian@gmail.com>; "enquiries@thereformparty.net" <enquiries@thereformparty.net>; "speakup@yoursdp.org" <speakup@yoursdp.org>; "speakup@singaporedemocrat.org" <speakup@singaporedemocrat.org>; spp feedback <feedback@spp.org.sg>; "admin@nsp.sg" <admin@nsp.sg>; "gohms99@yahoo.com.sg" <gohms99@yahoo.com.sg>; "wp@wp.sg" <wp@wp.sg>; "wp@wp.org.sg" <wp@wp.org.sg>; "v_bala@mewr.gov.sg" <v_bala@mewr.gov.sg>; "yaacob_ibrahim@mica.gov.sg" <yaacob_ibrahim@mica.gov.sg>; "yuenc@sph.com.sg" <yuenc@sph.com.sg>; "mps.chen@wp.sg" <mps.chen@wp.sg>; Thia-Kiang Low <ltk@wp.org.sg>; "sylvia@wp.sg" <sylvia@wp.sg>; "pritam.singh@wp.sg" <pritam.singh@wp.sg>; "faisal@wp.sg" <faisal@wp.sg>; "theonlinecitizen@gmail.com" <theonlinecitizen@gmail.com>; "reach@reach.gov.sg" <reach@reach.gov.sg>; "Gilbert Goh@yahoo" <goh_gilbert@yahoo.com>; KuanYew Lee <lee_kuan_yew@pmo.gov.sg>
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 6:54 PM
Subject: S'pore still long way from efficient/buzzy HK and civilised Japan!  

To: Transport Miniister Lui
cc: ex MM Lee
cc: PM Lee

3 Dec 2011

I just returned from holidays in Japan and Hong Kong, and these are some observations that Singapore still has a long way to go to match the vibrancy of HK and the civility of Japan:

1. At HK airport, the luggage are already out before the passengers reach the carousel, while back in Singapore Changi Airport, I had to wait for at least 20 minutes before my luggage came out! I remember Singapore used to pride itself to travelers that their luggage would be out before they reach the carousel! But not anymore! Why so? Is it because the jobs are now outsourced to cheaper "foreign talents"? 

I think it is pretty stupid and short-sighted to save on cost for short-term gain at the expense of long-term cost of traveler dissatisfaction! I was impressed in HK but not in Singapore as I was able to compare these 2 countries during the travel.

I was never caught in any jams despite the large population size and the equally large number of vehicles on the road, unlike in Singapore where jams are every day affairs nowadays. This clearly shows their road planning is streets ahead of Singapore. Public transport is a breeze. And the "buzz" is everywhere .... right into the night!

I remember ex MM Lee once chided the citizens for being complacent who needed spurs on their heels (or to that effect), but honestly, I think the Singapore ministers and top civil servants are the ones who are complacent who need spurs on their heels instead,

 so note to ex MM Lee, you were barking up the wrong tree! Or shall I say, the pot calling the kettle black!

All these years of good life and fat salaries/bonuses have dimmed your/their wits. Why not? If they make a mistake, the blame is deflected - either to some junior staff or, as in most cases, on Singaporeans. Remember the Mas Selamat case? Or citizens unable to get their flats? Blame themselves for being choosy? Traffic jams? Drivers are reckless for causing accidents that result in jams? Again, the list gos on .... 


2. Japan is truly first world - the people are so civilised, patient and courteous, and the place, especially the toilets, are really squeaky clean, unlike Singapore's. Almost stress-free living in Japan compared to daily stresses here in Singapore. We have our kiasuism everywhere like queue jumping, tissue "choping" syndrome, road rage and impatient drivers, etc.... the list goes on.

Will we ever reach Japan's standard, I wonder?

Rgds